Jakarta,
Jan 17, 2017 (Antara) - The Communication and Informatics Ministry has been
closely monitoring radical websites in Indonesia and has even blocked
several of them to prevent the spread of radical ideology.
On December 30, 2016, the ministry had blocked 11 websites: voa-islam.com, nahimunkar.com, kiblat.net, bisyarah.com, dakwahtangerang.com, islampos.com, suaranews.com, izzamedia.com, gensyiah.com, muqawamah.com, and abuzubair.net.
On December 30, 2016, the ministry had blocked 11 websites: voa-islam.com, nahimunkar.com, kiblat.net, bisyarah.com, dakwahtangerang.com, islampos.com, suaranews.com, izzamedia.com, gensyiah.com, muqawamah.com, and abuzubair.net.
The websites were blocked for allegedly disseminating negative news.
After
the websites were blocked, their operators had met Samuel A.
Pangerapan, the director general of Application and Informatics of the
ministry, on January 4, 2017.
Four of them urged the ministry to unblock their websites, while one expressed his objection to the act.
The
operator of voa-Islam.com was among those present at the meeting. The
ministry explained the reasons behind the blocking suggested by a
certain mass organization and the Police's counterterrorism squad Densus
88 and urged the operators to meet some requirements and conditions if
they wanted their websites to be unblocked.
The
ministry has requested the operator of voa-Islam.com to delete four
news stories deemed inappropriate including that on Densus 88,
non-active Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok, and Dutch
Christians who had colonized Indonesia in the past, according to
information on the voa-Islam.com website unblocked on January 10.
"There
are five websites that are unblocked," Pangarepan told Republika.co.id,
on Jan 9. The five are Islampos.com, Voa-islam.com, Suaranews.com,
Nahimunkar.com, and Kiblat.net.
At
the meeting, Chairman of the Press Council Yosep Stanley Adi Prasetyo
also urged the blocked websites to register with the Council and send
their reporters to undergo journalistic training and journalist
competence tests.
Furthermore,
the ministry is set to block more news portals that are not in line
with the existing Press Law, according to Pangarepan.
"There
will be a joint move along with the Press Council to block every
website claiming to be a news portal but not having a company name,
structure, legal status, and address, as demanded by the Press Law," he
stated.
The
measure is necessary to prevent hoax information or news that does not
follow the journalistic code of ethics, he added.
The
ministry will form a team to identify websites containing negative
content. There are around 40 thousand such websites, according to data
provided by the Press Council.
News
portals should apply for licenses and meet the necessary criteria on
the similar lines as other media companies, he remarked.
Within
two months, the ministry and Press Council will introduce the
prerequisites for being recognized as a news portal.
In
fact, the government has blocked some 800,000 websites since December
last year. Nearly 90 percent of them contained pornographic material,
gambling applications, and some others were spreading hoax information,
Pangerapan was quoted as saying recently by tempo.co.
Of the total, 766,633 websites were related to pornography and 85 related to radicalism.
A
response against the move to block Islam-related websites came from the
Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), which has expressed regret.
"The
blocking of Islamic sites has drawn reactions from some Muslims, as
this is very sensitive. This measure has its own pros and cons, although
it has been carried out under the pretext of countering radicalism and
terrorism," Deputy Chairman of MUI Zainut Tauhid Saadi stated recently.
The
Communication and Informatics Ministry has not tendered any explanation
regarding the meaning and criteria of radicalism, he noted.
"We
view the unilateral blocking of those websites as a regress in the
promotion of democracy in Indonesia. Any website blocking should be
conducted through a legal process because our country is based on laws,"
he remarked.
Website
blocking should not solely be conducted through the use of power.
Blocking without legal basis constitutes a violation of human rights,
particularly with regard to freedom of expression and speech, which is
clearly protected by the Constitution.
The
blocking of websites has also offended several Muslims, as not all
Islamic websites promote radicalism that leads to terrorism, he added.
"Why
are websites of other religions, which are also radical, provocative,
and anti-NKRI (the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia), allowed
and not blocked? Is it only an Islamic site that contains radical
content," he pointed out.
The
MUI has urged the ministry to evaluate its policy and to offer an
explanation before blocking any website, particularly those related to
religion.
By
adopting this approach, the ministry will be in a better position to
present its argument, which is clear and accountable legally, he stated.
The
move to block alleged radical websites had also been made in 2015. Tens
of websites allegedly promoting radical content had been blocked by the
ministry at the request of the Counterterrorism Agency, but several of
them had later been restored.
In
April 2015, the government had formed the Forum for Handling of
Websites with Negative Contents to identify websites to be blocked.
The
forum comprises four panels, respectively Panel I on pornography,
violence against children, and internet security; Panel II on terrorism,
race, ethnicity, religion, and hatred; Panel III on illegal
investigation, fraud, gambling, drugs, food, and narcotics; and Panel IV
on intellectual property rights.
***2***
(f001/INE/B003)
EDITED BY INE
(T.F001/A/BESSR/Bustanuddin) 17-01-2017
(f001/INE/B003)
EDITED BY INE
(T.F001/A/BESSR/Bustanuddin) 17-01-2017
No comments:
Post a Comment