Sabtu, 6 Jul 2019 21:22
Daerah : Jakarta
By Fardah
Jakarta, 6/7 (Antara) -
The 2019 presidential election held simultaneously with legislative
elections on April 17, 2019, across Indonesia was a long and tiring
process with a campaign lasting more than six months, leading to a
deeply divided nation.
The elections were considered the world's
biggest and most complex single-day vote on April 17, 2019, where 192
million people queued up at some 810 thousand polling stations,
resulting in unexpected deaths of some 700 polling officers, mostly
after working for two days at a stretch after serving voters on polling
day.
The 2019 race was a replay of the contentious 2014
presidential election that exposed the nation's divide, as Joko Widodo
(Jokowi) faced retired general Prabowo Subianto.
The General
Elections Commission (KPU) announced the final results on May 22, 2019,
at 1:28 a.m., declaring that the Jokowi-Maruf Amin pair had secured 85
million votes, or 55.5 percent of the national vote, as compared to
contenders Prabowo Subianto-Sandiaga Uno who received 68 million votes,
or 44.5 percent.
The Jokowi-Amin pair declared victory, while
the Prabowo-Sandiaga pair rejected the KPU's official tabulation result
and challenged it in the Constitutional Court (MK).
MK's nine
judges announced their final ruling session on June 27, 2019, by
rejecting in totality the Prabowo-Sandiaga pair's petition.
President-elect
Jokowi and Vice President-elect Ma'ruf Amin will soon form a new
cabinet for the 2019-2024 period, according to Arsul Sani, deputy
chairman of TKN, Jokowis national campaign team.
Leaders of
the 10 political parties supporting Jokowis Indonesia Working Coalition
(KIK) are likely to join the new cabinet. These parties are the ruling
PDIP, PKB, PPP, Golkar, Nasdem, PSI, Perindo, PKPI, Hanura, and the
latest one, PBB.
The Indonesian Justice Prosperity Coalition
comprising Gerindra, PKS, PAN, Democratic Party (PD) and Berkarya that
carried Prabowo Subianto and his running mate Sandiaga Uno in the 2019
Presidential Election was declared defunct by Subianto, so their
leadership could take the next political steps freely, Gerindra Party
Secretary General Ahmad Muzani said.
Subianto, the founder of
Gerindra Party, issued an apology to his coalition parties and
supporters since the struggle to ascertain the truth had been decided by
the Constitutional Court and it would obey the decision.
The
struggle to save the Indonesian nation, however, is not over and has to
be nurtured and fostered so that it continues to survive in the midst of
society, according to Muzani.
Gerindra and PKS most likely
will continue to be opposition parties. Mardani Ali Sera, although it
has not been officially announced, according to the deputy secretary
general of PKS. "I personally believe that critical and constructive
opposition is the most rational choice for the current condition,"
Mardani Sera said.
Prabowo Subianto will absorb the
aspirations of his supporters and discuss it with Gerindras cadres
before declaring the partys stance, according to Andre Rosiade, Deputy
Secretary General of Gerindra.
The party has been in the
opposition since the start, and it should remain there to make
Indonesias democracy healthy and to apply the checks and balances for a
proper democratic system, Muhammad Syafii, member of the Advisory Board
of Gerindra, said. Therefore, the party will decline any offer to be a
part of the government, including any ministerial position, he
confirmed.
In addition, Pangi Syarwi Chaniago, a political
analyst of the Voxpo Center for Research and Consulting, believed that
the opposition group plays a paramount role in conducting checks and
balances deemed crucial for democracy to thrive.
"The system
of checks and balances is deemed necessary to materialize controlled
governance so that the government in power does not go off track and act
arbitrarily," he remarked.
Chaniago emphasized the need to
view the checks and balances mechanism as an integral and inseparable
unit of the democratic system. He called for the opposition parties to
strengthen themselves to intensify their role in conducting the critical
system of checks and balances.
Currently, the coalition of
political parties supporting the government in the Parliament is quite
dominant, reaching notably 60 percent. Any endeavor to recompose the
coalition after the election will indicate the coalition's flagging
confidence in its own political power, he remarked.
Moreover, a
"recomposition" will hint at an effort to silence the opposition, so
that they would no longer be critical against the government, he stated.
"Such political intrigue can be averted by forming a permanent and
unshakable coalition despite the temptation of power sharing," he noted.
Speaking
in connection with an offer made to the Gerindra Party to join the
coalition of political parties supporting the Jokowi administration,
Chaniago advised the party, founded by Subianto, to refuse it, as it
would not be conducive for democracy. Moreover, it will degrade the
quality of democracy in Indonesia.
Another political observer,
however, opined that if Indonesia's opposition political parties were
to constitute only the Gerindra and the Justice Prosperous (PKS), then
the system of checks and balances would not be effective.
"If
the opposition constitutes only PKS and Gerindra, it would be certain
that the government's policies will easily be passed in the Parliament,
as the composition is unable to balance the number of executives
supported by majority of the political parties," political observer Yusa
Djuyandi stated.
The opposition parties should preferably
have 45 percent of seats in the Parliament, Djuyandi noted. If only PD
and PAN were to remain with Gerindra and the PKS, then the checks and
balances mechanism would be ideal, he explained.
However,
based on a recent political communication, PD and PAN would likely join
the Jokowi administration's political party coalition. Hence, Gerindra
and PKS will be the only opposition parties, he confirmed.
In
contrast, Ignasius Jaques Juru, researcher of PolGov Research Center of
University of Gadjah Mada, stated the opposition, despite comprising
only Great Indonesia Movement (Gerindra) and Prosperous Justice Party
(PKS), will remain effective in the Parliament.
"If there is
control in terms of the context of 'discourses,' quantity is not
relevant, as the important aspect is the quality of the discourses," he
told Antara.
Juru cited the example of the PDIP party when it
remained in the opposition during the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY)
administration and was yet able to have critical discourses.
The opposition is important as long as it manages to produce constructive and critical discourses.
Moreover,
the opposition is needed to ensure that the checks and balances
mechanism is applied in the deliberative democratic process, so it could
demand government policies for meeting the public's aspirations.
No comments:
Post a Comment