Economic crisis that hit Asia in 1997 brought about the
collapse of the Indonesian economy.
The prolonged crisis triggered the Indonesian people to
demand for political reform, which later forced
President Soeharto to step down in 1998. Since then the word
‘Reformasi’ (or reform) has become very
The role of the media has been very significant to keep the
process of reform rolling until now. A crucial
factor that has enabled the media to play its role is the
Law No. 40 on the Press, which was issued in
1999.
Thanks to the press law, which guarantees freedom of the
press, the media have no hesitation to expose
used-to-be ‘sensitive’ cases such as corruption and violence
involving military officers. Those media
exposures have improved the awareness of the public and
inspired them to pursue further reforms
including political, financial, and administrative reforms.
Indonesia has since taken a number of steps, such as four
constitutional amendments and direct legislative
and presidential elections to build thriving democracy. To
the astonishment of the international public,
Indonesians managed to conduct an open and democratic direct
electoral process in 2004 that resulted in
the election of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as the
sixth president of the Republic.
Another significant step is the establishment of the
Constitutional Court and Judicial Commission, which
are pivotal in the structural development of Indonesia’s
legal institutions. However, there are criticisms
saying that law enforcers and the judiciary are frequently
hampered in their professional independence,
among other things due to political interferences.
A recent survey done by TNS-Indonesia of the Jakarta Post
readers showed that although seven years
have passed since Indonesia has undergone reform movement,
the majority of survey respondents said
they had seen not much improvement in law enforcement, human
rights protection and public service.
In the water sector, a number of laws and regulations have
been issued to improve the management and
development of water resources on a sustainable basis.
In February 2004, the Parliament, despite strong opposition
from NGOs, approved the Water Resources
Law No.7/2004, which provides for the decentralization of control
over Indonesia’s water resources to
regional entities and water user associations, and opens a
door for the private sector participation.
A number of Indonesian NGOs demonstrating their opposition
to the law, filed a judicial review to the
Indonesian Constitutional Court. They argued that some
articles of the Law were unconstitutional and
would turn water into a profit-oriented business and
possibly threaten people’s access to safe and
affordable water.
However, on July 19, 2005, the Indonesia Constitutional
Court upheld the constitutionality of the Water
Resources Law No.7/2004. Out of nine judges, two issued
dissenting opinions based on fears that the
legislation could cause the possible commercialization of
the water sector. The Court ordered the
government to issue ancillary regulations for the
legislation and must ensure affordable access for the
public to water resources. In March 2005, Indonesia issued a
government regulation PP No.16/2005 on
the Development of Drinking Water Supply System to follow up
the law no. 7/2004. However, there were
not much socialization and the involvement of the community
in drafting the new regulation, as it was
rarely reported in the media.
Perhaps there should have been more socialization and active
participation of the community in the
drafting process of the law and regulation. The general
public has the right to be involved in issues that
concern them most.
An active and involved community is crucial because it
allows for a broader public support. Therefore,
the success of a water management program depends among
other things on the people’s active
involvement. Public participation and open processes could
ensure decisions are based on realities and
could help obtain public trust on the legitimacy of
decision-making processes.
“When legitimacy diminishes, so does the ability of legal
and political authorities to influence public
behavior and to function effectively,” said Tom Tyler,
psychology professor at the New York University
on “Why People Obey the Law (1990)”.
There are many ways to involve the public, such as through
the media, the educational sector, Internet,
youth involvement, advocacy, large public events, meetings,
and discussions. The media can help bring
policies to the people and convey inputs from the public to
the decision makers.
For most media, however, water is not a ‘sexy’ topic, unlike
political and economic issues, which often
become top of the news agenda. As long as I remember,
water-related news became headlines in the past
few years only when big floods hit Jakarta in 2002 and when
Aceh and Nias were hit by the tragic
tsunami in 2004.
According to data from WHO/UNICEF, 65 percent of Indonesia's
population are not served by water supply
and 80 percent are deprived of sanitation.
Up to 3,000 children under five years die every day in the East
Asia and Pacific region due to water-borne diseases. Those
saddening facts are rarely printed on the front
page of newspapers.
The media should focus on the poor, who have no access to
potable water, on tariffs, on government’s
policies and private sector involvement in water management.
To be able to present these issues
accurately and clearly to the public, journalists must first
be well informed on water problems.
Given the fact that water issue is not yet considered a
priority or ‘saleable’ item, so it is quite normal that
not all media owners would likely be willing to invest in
educating their journalists about water-related
issues.
Therefore, any party – government, NGOs or companies - would
be very much appreciated if they care
for journalists training in order to promote wider media
coverage and better quality of writing on the
subject .
The Asian Development Bank (ADB), for example, has conducted
one regional and nine national media
workshops for journalists, including the one that was held
in Indonesia in December 2004.
Principles for effective water governance include openness
and transparency, inclusion and
communication, coherence and integration, equity and ethic.
Pro-poor policy needs a strong political will
to achieve a just solution in water management.
Fardah Assegaf
ANTARA News Agency of Indonesia
Bali, August 29, 2005
No comments:
Post a Comment